Services / Advisory
Choose emissions-reduction projects that make business sense.
Compare projects by emissions reduction, financial returns, resilience, feasibility, and timing.
When this helps
A target has been announced, but the delivery plan is unclear. Efficiency, fleet, energy, and supplier initiatives compete for limited capital.
What this helps you decide
Decide which initiatives to investigate, fund, sequence, or defer—and what assumptions could change that decision.
What you receive
- Baseline and target-boundary assessment with explicit assumptions and dependencies.
- Prioritized initiative portfolio and emissions-reduction roadmap.
- Business cases showing lifecycle cash flows, capital needs, and net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and payback where relevant.
- Financing-options assessment where relevant, plus owners, milestones, and progress measures.
How we work
Confirm the baseline and decision criteria; develop a comparable set of initiatives; assess emissions and cash-flow implications; test sensitivities; and sequence implementation with operations and finance.
Technical approach and standards
Target design considers the relevant accounting boundary, baseline, sector pathway, and current target-setting guidance. Finance work assesses mechanisms and funding structures for the specific business case; it does not promise eligibility or funding.
Scope and boundaries
Financial analysis uses assumptions and investment benchmarks agreed with finance or treasury. Engineering design, tax opinions, investment advice, financing placement, and guaranteed savings are excluded. Target validation, if sought, remains with the relevant external body.
Who should be involved
Finance and capital allocation leaders, operations, engineering, procurement, treasury, strategy, and sustainability.
Turn a target into a practical plan.
Bring the initiatives, constraints, and capital decisions you need to compare.